USCIS to Implement Stricter Naturalization Test and Moral Character Reviews for Green Card Holders
This policy shift significantly raises the bar for Green Card holders seeking U.S. citizenship, demanding deeper civic knowledge and a more scrutinized personal history.
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay informed about latest H1B news, policy updates and and other developments.
Article Summary
USCIS is implementing stricter naturalization requirements starting October 20, 2025, for Green Card holders filing Form N-400. Applicants will now need to correctly answer 12 out of 20 civics questions from a 128-question pool, an increase from the previous 6 out of 10. Additionally, the policy emphasizes a more stringent review of 'good moral character,' potentially including neighborhood investigations, to 'restore integrity to the naturalization process.'
Original Article: hindustantimes.com
[ Sentiment: negative | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
[ Sentiment: negative | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
TNP AI: Key Insights
This change directly impacts thousands of Green Card holders planning to naturalize, particularly those who have resided in the U.S. for many years and may not have anticipated such stringent requirements. For employers, this could mean a longer path to full integration for some key foreign talent, potentially affecting long-term workforce planning.
The return to a more rigorous civics test and the potential reintroduction of 'neighborhood investigations' harkens back to earlier eras of immigration policy, signaling a move towards a more selective and values-based assessment of aspiring citizens, contrasting with the more streamlined processes of recent decades. This move by USCIS could face scrutiny from immigrant advocacy groups, potentially leading to legal challenges or calls for legislative review, especially concerning the subjective nature of 'good moral character' assessments and privacy implications of neighborhood investigations.