USCIS Clarifies $100K H-1B Fee: Exempts In-Country Extensions and Status Changes
This crucial USCIS clarification provides immediate financial relief and certainty for current H-1B visa holders and international graduates already in the US, while the broader fee for new petitions from abroad remains contentious.
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay informed about latest H1B news, policy updates and and other developments.
Article Summary
USCIS has clarified that the new $100,000 H-1B petition fee will only apply to new petitions filed for workers outside the US or those needing to depart before processing. International graduates and current H-1B holders applying for amendments, extensions, or changes of status within the US are exempt from this charge. This guidance addresses confusion following the President's proclamation introducing the fee.
Original Article: economictimes.indiatimes.com
[ Sentiment: neutral | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
[ Sentiment: neutral | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
TNP AI: Key Insights
This USCIS clarification offers significant relief and certainty for thousands of H-1B visa holders and international graduates already within the US, who were previously facing the prospect of an exorbitant $100,000 fee for status adjustments. It directly addresses the immediate anxiety for individuals and minimizes potential disruptions for employers relying on existing skilled talent.
While mitigating the impact on in-country applicants, the fee still applies to new petitions for workers outside the US, maintaining a substantial barrier to entry for international talent. This differential application could encourage employers to prioritize domestic talent pools or shift recruitment strategies towards individuals already in the US, while the ongoing lawsuit against the original proclamation indicates continued legal contention over the fee's legality and scope.
