USCIS Clarifies $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee for In-Country Status Changes
This clarification provides significant relief and clarity for skilled professionals and students already within the US who are navigating the transition to H-1B status or seeking extensions, directly impacting their career trajectories and employers' talent strategies.
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay informed about latest H1B news, policy updates and and other developments.
Article Summary
The USCIS has issued a clarification regarding a $100,000 H-1B visa fee, stating it will not apply to individuals already in the US who are changing visa status, such as from F-1 to H-1B, or extending their stay. The fee will, however, apply to new H-1B petitions for workers outside the United States or those required to leave the country before approval. This guidance aims to resolve confusion caused by a presidential order.
Original Article: india.com
[ Sentiment: positive | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
[ Sentiment: positive | Tone: factual ]
This summary and analysis were generated by TheNewsPublisher's editorial AI. This content is for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
TNP AI: Key Insights
This USCIS clarification is crucial for the H-1B ecosystem, as the initial broad announcement of a $100,000 fee by the Trump administration caused widespread anxiety and uncertainty among international students and employers. By explicitly exempting in-country status changes and extensions, USCIS has addressed a major concern for those already contributing to the US economy.
For employers, particularly in the tech sector, this means they can continue to retain and hire talent from the existing pool of F-1 visa holders without incurring a prohibitive additional fee, thereby streamlining workforce planning. Conversely, the fee still applies to new H-1B petitions for applicants outside the US, indicating a continued financial barrier for international recruitment efforts and potentially influencing where companies source their skilled talent globally.
